Share article
Share article
The post was a quote tweet of Nansen's own Week 2 announcement. In the original message, Nansen set the window as March 23 to March 29 (SGT) and laid out judging criteria that are unusually specific for a crypto "build" campaign: creativity, real-world usefulness, technical depth, and presentation clarity. It also flagged an operational detail that matters for anyone expecting to be paid: winners will be contacted by DM for verification before prizes are sent.
One community reply pointed to Nansen's eligibility requirements via an external link, a reminder that these promos often come with restrictions (jurisdiction, age, verification, and similar). Anyone building with the expectation of collecting prizes should check that page before sinking time into a proper submission.
Why this matters: CLI tooling is where a lot of serious on-chain work happens, especially for quants and ops teams that need repeatable pipelines. If Nansen can get developers to standardise workflows around its CLI and API credits, it strengthens its position as infrastructure, not just a dashboard.
Risk check: the fastest way for this to fizzle is if winners feel the verification process is opaque, or if the "40+ submissions" number does not translate into genuinely useful open-source outputs. The real tell will be whether Week 2 produces tools people keep using after the prizes are gone.
Companies Referenced
Tags
Original tweet



