Share article

Follow-up story to:

A dark metallic coin split down the center, fused by a glowing circuit-like seam against a black background.

Zcash Open Development Lab Raises $25M Seed to Build Zodl Wallet and Accelerate Protocol Upgrades

Zcash Open Development Lab raises $25M seed after ECC team exits amid governance dispute, to launch Zodl self-custody wallet and speed Zcash protocol upgrades.

Callum HargreavesMar 9 15:37$ZEC
Foundry just told the market it is not content printing blocks on Bitcoin$62,592.54 alone. The biggest pool operator in Bitcoin$62,592.54 mining is stepping into Zcash$355.81 with a new, institutional-grade pool, and that is a real signal about where mining infrastructure is headed. [1]
Morning Crypto Report: Ripple's Jed McCaleb Joins Forbes Rich List, SHIB Tests $3.5B Mark, MARA Starts Selling Bitcoin

Enjoy articles without ads?

Register for free and get unlimited access to all articles.

Foundry's move: from BTC dominance to a Zcash beachhead

Foundry, best known for running one of the largest Bitcoin$62,592.54 mining pools by blocks found, is launching support for Zcash$355.81 miners via a dedicated pool designed for institutional operators. [2] This is not a casual "we added another coin" toggle. The messaging is clearly aimed at professional miners, treasury-backed operators, and firms that care about compliance, reporting, and predictable payouts.
The timing also lands during a risk-off tape for majors. Bitcoin was recently around $70,139 (down about 1.37%) while Zcash$355.81 traded near $210.89 (down about 6.76%) based on the referenced price data. [3] Price is not the story here, but volatility is, and institutions tend to prefer infrastructure providers that can make operational life boring.
Arthur Hayes Hits the Brakes on Bitcoin: 'I Wouldn't Bet $1 Right Now'

Why Zcash, and why an "institutional-grade" pool?

Zcash is a privacy-focused asset, and privacy coins sit in a weird spot in crypto: strong user demand in some circles, high regulatory sensitivity in others. That creates friction for large miners that want exposure to non-Bitcoin revenue streams but do not want to get blindsided by compliance questions from banking partners, auditors, or hosting providers.

Foundry's pitch is essentially: if you want to mine Zcash like an adult business, here is a venue that looks and feels like the mining rails you already use for Bitcoin.

An "institutional-grade" pool, in practice, usually implies a few concrete things:

  • Compliance posture: clearer policies around sanctions screening, counterparty risk, and operational controls (the unsexy stuff that keeps enterprise partners comfortable).
  • Reliable payouts and accounting: stable payout schemes, detailed statements, and easier reconciliation for firms running real balance sheets.
  • Professional support and uptime: SLAs in spirit if not on paper, dedicated account management, and infrastructure that can handle hashrate swings without falling over.
  • Risk controls: tooling that reduces the chance a miner gets rekt by pool downtime, misconfigured payouts, or opaque fee structures.
Foundry has already built that brand image in Bitcoin. Extending it to Zcash is a logical adjacency: new revenue line for Foundry, and a "safe hands" option for miners who want to diversify beyond Bitcoin. [4]

What this says about the mining business right now

Bitcoin mining is still the main game, but it is also brutally competitive post-halving cycles, fee volatility, and constant efficiency pressure. Public miners and large private operators increasingly look like industrial energy companies with a crypto wrapper. When margins tighten, adding optionality matters, even if it is just the ability to point some capacity elsewhere when the math makes sense.

A Zcash pool expansion is basically a bet that:

  1. There is enough institutional demand for Zcash exposure through mining, not just spot buying.
  2. Compliance-friendly infrastructure is a differentiator, especially for privacy-adjacent assets that can trigger extra diligence.
  3. Foundry's distribution is strong enough to attract meaningful Zcash hashrate without having to win a race to the bottom on fees.

This also fits a broader trend: mining is becoming a services business. Pools are not just "connect and pray," they are moving toward enterprise tooling, financing relationships, treasury services, and integrations that reduce operational overhead.

The trade-offs: decentralization questions will come fast

Whenever a dominant operator in one network expands into another, decentralization concerns follow. Bitcoiners have debated pool concentration for years, and Zcash has its own community sensitivities, particularly given its privacy identity and the importance of credible neutrality.

A large, compliance-forward pool can raise hard questions:

  • Could the pool become a soft chokepoint? If a big share of Zcash hashrate routes through one operator, policy decisions start to matter more.
  • What happens under regulatory pressure? Even if mining itself is not transaction selection in the same way as validators, pools still influence block production and have operational discretion.
  • Does "institutional-grade" equal "permissioned vibes"? Institutions like guardrails. Privacy communities often do not.
None of this automatically means "bad." It does mean the Zcash ecosystem will likely scrutinize governance, transparency, and how Foundry handles edge cases.

What it means for miners and ZEC liquidity

For miners, the immediate value proposition is simple: another high-quality place to point hashrate, potentially with better reporting, cleaner payouts, and fewer operational surprises. For larger miners, it can also reduce vendor sprawl. One operator supporting multiple networks can simplify ops, especially if the pool integrates into existing monitoring and treasury workflows.

For Zcash itself, a reputable mining pool operator entering the market can cut both ways:
  • Bull case: more professional infrastructure, potentially improved network reliability, and a credibility boost that makes institutions less allergic to Zcash exposure.
  • Bear case: more perceived centralization, and more attention from regulators who already side-eye privacy coins.
Either way, it is a reminder that liquidity and infrastructure are linked. If serious miners show up, market makers and venues tend to pay more attention. If the hashrate becomes concentrated, critics get louder.
Crypto News Summary March 12

What to watch next

Execution will matter more than the announcement.

  • If Foundry quickly captures meaningful Zcash hashrate, expect competitor pools to respond with fee cuts or upgraded tooling, and expect the decentralization debate to heat up. [5]
  • If the pool stays small, the signal shifts: institutions might still be cautious around privacy coin mining, or the economics might not be pulling enough miners off their current setups.
  • If Zcash volatility stays high while Bitcoin remains comparatively stable, watch whether miners treat Zcash as opportunistic "extra yield" or as a longer-term diversification lane.
If Foundry's Zcash pool gains traction without drama, it is a template: institutional mining infrastructure expanding beyond Bitcoin, one compliant on-ramp at a time. If it stumbles, expect the market to read it as a warning that privacy coin adjacency is still a third-rail for big players.

Tags

#Bitcoin Mining#Zcash#privacy coins#compliance#Mining infrastructure#Foundry#Mining pool#Institutional mining