Share article

Follow-up story to:

Cracked metallic balance scale holding a glowing coin on one side and scattered dim voting chips on the other, black background.

CLARITY Act Approval Odds Slide to 42% on Prediction Markets as Stablecoin Talks Near a Key Vote

Prediction markets cut CLARITY Act approval odds to 42% from 72% as stablecoin language talks near a key vote, signaling rising risk in DC this week.

Ravi DeshmukhFeb 24 08:12$ETH
Coinbase's USDC$1.0005-linked revenue stream is back in focus after Bloomberg Intelligence floated a spicy but modelable scenario: stablecoin revenue could expand by as much as 7x if USDC$1.0005 payments adoption really starts to scale. The catalyst is not a meme cycle, it is the slow grind of payments rails plus a Washington rulebook that may rewrite how stablecoins can be marketed.[1]
Bloomberg's framing matters because Coinbase has already shown it can monetize USDC$1.0005 at meaningful size. Per the report, stablecoin revenue (largely tied to Coinbase's USDC revenue share with Circle) was about 19% of total revenue in 2025, and Bloomberg Intelligence sees a path for that line item to grow two to seven times under the right conditions.[1]

Enjoy articles without ads?

Register for free and get unlimited access to all articles.

Why USDC is a revenue lever for Coinbase

Coinbase is not just "listing USDC." It is economically entangled with it.

USDC is issued by Circle, but Coinbase is a primary distribution venue and partner. Coinbase participates in a revenue-share arrangement connected to USDC, which generally tracks the yield generated on reserve assets and, depending on product flow, other USDC-related economics. That means Coinbase's take is influenced by three big variables:

  1. USDC supply and where it sits (on Coinbase, in wallets, in payment apps, in DeFi, in merchant flows).
  2. Interest rate conditions (reserve yield is not constant across macro regimes).
  3. Payment velocity (how often USDC gets used as money, not just parked as dry powder).

The Bloomberg Intelligence thesis is basically: if USDC stops being primarily a "trader stablecoin" and becomes a high-frequency payments instrument, Coinbase can earn more consistently, and potentially at much larger scale.

Payments scaling is not about TVL, it is about repeat usage

Crypto Twitter loves to talk about total value locked, exchange volume, and whale flows. Payments is a different game.[2] You care less about one giant mint and more about:
  • Daily active users spending stablecoins for real goods and services
  • Repeat transactions (high frequency, lower size)
  • Distribution channels that make USDC feel native (checkout, remittance, payroll, creator payouts)

That is the subtext of Bloomberg's model. If USDC becomes the default "internet dollar" for certain payment corridors, then Coinbase's USDC-linked revenue could look less like a cyclical trading add-on and more like a durable services business.

It is also why the upside range is wide. Going from "stablecoin used mostly as settlement between exchanges" to "stablecoin used as a consumer and SMB payment rail" is not a 20% improvement. It is a regime shift.
Crypto Payments Firm RedotPay Reportedly Targets US IPO, Seeking Up to $1B at $4B+ Valuation

The political kicker: stablecoin rewards could get banned

Bloomberg also points to a key policy risk: Congress is weighing a ban on stablecoin rewards, which could change how stablecoins are distributed and how users are incentivized to hold them.[3]

If rewards are restricted, two things can happen at once:

  • Some growth tactics get kneecapped. Rewards have been a straightforward way to pull stablecoin balances onto platforms.
  • Payments could become the cleaner narrative. If you cannot pay users to sit on stables, you push harder on utility, integrations, and merchant acceptance.
That does not automatically mean Coinbase loses. It means the playbook shifts from "grow balances via incentives" to "grow usage via product and partnerships." Bloomberg's angle suggests the long-term monetization may still be there, but it could arrive through transactional activity and platform distribution instead of rewards-led accumulation.
CLARITY Act Approval Odds Slide to 42% on Prediction Markets as Stablecoin Talks Near a Key Vote

Coinbase's revenue mix is already telling you the direction

The timing is notable. Coinbase reported a net loss of $667 million in Q4 2025, according to the cited shareholder reporting referenced by Cointelegraph.[4] That kind of quarter is exactly why investors care about revenue streams that are:

  • less dependent on spot trading volumes,
  • easier to forecast,
  • tied to broader adoption, not just speculation.
USDC-linked revenue fits that brief better than most crypto-native business lines. Even if the underlying mechanics still depend on rate levels and partner economics, the customer use case of "digital dollars moving around the internet" is simpler to defend than "retail traders rotating alts."
So when Bloomberg flags stablecoin revenue at 19% of total revenue in 2025, it is not just trivia. It is a signal that stablecoins have already graduated into a core contributor, and the bull case is that they become a bigger pillar.

What has to go right for a 7x outcome

A sevenfold jump is not magic. It implies multiple reinforcing wins:

USDC needs sustained payments distribution

Scaling payments means getting USDC into apps and workflows where users do not think about chains or fees. That can happen through wallets, merchant processors, remittance products, and exchange-linked payment experiences.

Regulation needs to clarify, not choke, stablecoin usage

A stablecoin bill that legitimizes reserve standards and issuer requirements could expand adoption. A ruleset that bans certain incentive structures might reduce one growth channel but still support payments expansion if compliance becomes a moat.

Coinbase needs to defend its take rate and partnership economics

Even if USDC adoption rips, Coinbase's revenue depends on its deal terms and competitive positioning. If distribution fragments across fintechs and wallets that do not route through Coinbase, the upside compresses.

Macro conditions still matter

If USDC revenue is meaningfully tied to reserve yields, rate cuts can reduce per-dollar monetization. Payments volume could offset that, but the model has to assume some combination of higher usage and acceptable yield.

The bear case: competition and commoditization

Stablecoins are not a winner-take-all market. Tether$0.999021 remains dominant in many trading venues, and newer stablecoin models keep showing up with different collateral structures and distribution tactics. If payments growth happens but does not accrue primarily to USDC, Coinbase's upside shrinks.
There is also classic platform risk: once stablecoins become "just plumbing," margins can compress. Payments processors, wallet providers, and fintechs will all fight for a slice. Coinbase's advantage is its regulated footprint and consumer distribution, but that is not an automatic lock on payment flows.
Tether-Backed Crypto Exchange Ditches Retail to Build Stablecoin 'Plumbing' for Europe's Biggest Banks

Takeaway: watch adoption signals, not hype, and keep the risks explicit

Bloomberg Intelligence putting 2x to 7x on the table is a reminder that USDC is no longer a side quest for Coinbase, it is a potential engine. The cleanest bull read is simple: if USDC payments scale, Coinbase can monetize stablecoin usage more like a services business than a trading casino.

The invalidation points are just as clear: regulation that blocks key distribution tactics, rate-driven revenue compression without enough payment volume to compensate, or payments adoption accruing to competitors instead of USDC. For anyone positioned in the Coinbase narrative, the real tell will be whether USDC shows sustained growth as money in motion, not just liquidity sitting still.

Tags

#crypto payments#Coinbase#stablecoin regulation#USDC#Stablecoin Payments#Circle#Bloomberg Intelligence#Revenue growth#Reserve yield#Interest Rates